|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 9:30 am
I think I might've found a decent looking and fairly inexpensive (as compared to others) prosthetic that is realistic, and can be glued to the body (I think it can). There are pack n plays available so you don't have to switch from a packer to a "play" http://www.lolajake.com/index.htmlWhat do you guys think? Would it be worth it to any of you as a good alternative?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 1:37 pm
I've never seen something so realistic. They look like they've been cut off a man's crotch. I'd get one for sure.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:21 pm
Damn, they do look realistic. Still cost quite a lot of money, though. And, well, I'm wary of the idea of gluing things to my nads.
I suppose it's down to the individual on that. I know I'm probably odd in that I'm not hugely concerned about packing - I know it's a big deal in a sexual situation, but in day to day life, nobody can see what I'm stashing in my pants, and the expense (not to mention the awkwardness - what are my flatmates gonna say if they find me sterilising my c**k in the kitchen?) puts me off.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:16 pm
Oh my god, those are the most realistic looking things I've ever seen....They're still pretty expensive but I'd take $300-500 over $1000-2000 any day. I just need to get some extra money...
'Specially useful now that I might be getting a boyfriend... xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:58 pm
Yea, there's another australian site that sells something similar for a thousand USD I think. $100 is a little more than an average silicone "play" prosthetic.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 5:56 pm
Those are nice. XD And the price is way less out there than most of what I've been seeing in looking around. I'd definitely pick one up if I had the spare cash on hand. Think I might even have my eye on one already.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:51 am
The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. Ooh woaah ooh yeah Filth in the Beauty The shinyness bothers me. *shrugs*
...I want a pack n' play of an UNCIRCUMSIZED p***s. Then I will be happy.
Cut penises are so ugly. emo Sexual Disgrace Closet mind is distorted instability. please release me before breaking. So long... So long... So long... In humiliation The final art is your dead face
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:25 pm
wow! those are realistic packers.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:18 pm
FurFag The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. Ooh woaah ooh yeah Filth in the Beauty The shinyness bothers me. *shrugs*
...I want a pack n' play of an UNCIRCUMSIZED p***s. Then I will be happy.
Cut penises are so ugly. emo Sexual Disgrace Closet mind is distorted instability. please release me before breaking. So long... So long... So long... In humiliation The final art is your dead face Yeah, that's often one of my peeves with prosthetics. Hardly anyone is circumcised in the UK these days; cut penisses look weird to me. It wouldn't be much of a problem on a cheapish, unrealistic strap-on d***o, but if I felt like aiming for realism, it'd be a bit odd.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:28 pm
FurFag The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. Ooh woaah ooh yeah Filth in the Beauty The shinyness bothers me. *shrugs*
...I want a pack n' play of an UNCIRCUMSIZED p***s. Then I will be happy.
Cut penises are so ugly. emo Sexual Disgrace Closet mind is distorted instability. please release me before breaking. So long... So long... So long... In humiliation The final art is your dead face powder your p***s? Plus site says after awhile of wearing it the shine will dull. And if you use an uncut one it seems like it'd be easier to notice as a prosthetic.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:06 pm
nygeel13 FurFag The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. Ooh woaah ooh yeah Filth in the Beauty The shinyness bothers me. *shrugs*
...I want a pack n' play of an UNCIRCUMSIZED p***s. Then I will be happy.
Cut penises are so ugly. emo Sexual Disgrace Closet mind is distorted instability. please release me before breaking. So long... So long... So long... In humiliation The final art is your dead face powder your p***s? Plus site says after awhile of wearing it the shine will dull. And if you use an uncut one it seems like it'd be easier to notice as a prosthetic. Much easier to tell the difference, if you've ever touched an uncut c**k before - or seen it being touched. The skin moves alot and most mens foreskin can unfold down the head of the p***s - this is just NOT possible with the materials avaliable. And by "Not possible" I mean practicle - it could be done but it would rip/tear quite easily. If you opted for a p***s with tighter foreskin you'd get more into sanitary problems with cleaning it - unless its made of material you just boil to steralize [silicone?? I dont remember] and again it would be prone to tearing. If you got one with foreskin that is fixed to the head of the p***s... well thats a medical problem actually..... personally I dislike uncut penises, its just my love of pretty smooth things that makes feel that way [that and most of the people I actually KNOW who have uncut penises are really dirty/grimy LOL so I'm biased]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:35 pm
not_my_god nygeel13 FurFag The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. The reverse side of beauty It dyed by beloved filth. Ooh woaah ooh yeah Filth in the Beauty The shinyness bothers me. *shrugs*
...I want a pack n' play of an UNCIRCUMSIZED p***s. Then I will be happy.
Cut penises are so ugly. emo Sexual Disgrace Closet mind is distorted instability. please release me before breaking. So long... So long... So long... In humiliation The final art is your dead face powder your p***s? Plus site says after awhile of wearing it the shine will dull. And if you use an uncut one it seems like it'd be easier to notice as a prosthetic. Much easier to tell the difference, if you've ever touched an uncut c**k before - or seen it being touched. The skin moves alot and most mens foreskin can unfold down the head of the p***s - this is just NOT possible with the materials avaliable. And by "Not possible" I mean practicle - it could be done but it would rip/tear quite easily. If you opted for a p***s with tighter foreskin you'd get more into sanitary problems with cleaning it - unless its made of material you just boil to steralize [silicone?? I dont remember] and again it would be prone to tearing. If you got one with foreskin that is fixed to the head of the p***s... well thats a medical problem actually..... personally I dislike uncut penises, its just my love of pretty smooth things that makes feel that way [that and most of the people I actually KNOW who have uncut penises are really dirty/grimy LOL so I'm biased] The reverse side of beauty It dyed beloved filth. The reverse side of beauty It dyed beloved filth. Ooh woaah ooh yeah Filth in the Beauty I see cut penises and all I an think is mushroom on a stick. My boyfriend is uncut and his p***s is beautiful but that is biased too so. xd Uncut penises are more smooth to me because of the foreskin. I don't like the little lip between the head and the shaft. Sexual Disgrace Closet mind is distorted instability. Please release me before breaking. So long... So long... So long... In humiliation The final art is your dead face.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 2:57 pm
This price is a much more affordable than the Australian ones I was previously looking at.
I'm personally up for the whole "gluing on" thing. Then I won't have to think about it most of the time.
Issues I have with spending more than $100 on a c**k:
- I want it to be light enough to wear without a harness.
- I don't want it to irritate my t-d**k, as most packers do now that I've started testosterone.
- I want it to be uncut somehow. I know that isn't going to happen anytime soon or ever. But I've only ever been with men that are uncut. It's what I know, what I'm used to, and with bias of course, seems more fun.
- I want to be able to pee from it!!
So I'm holding off on buying myself a nice c**k for now.
Surgery is super freaking scary yet a large part of me still considers going the route of metoidioplasty with urethral lengthening assuming I ever have the funds to do such a procedure.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 3:32 pm
Meto is probably the best solution as of now. I prefer waiting until stem cell allows us to grow our own, but if that never happens, I'll get meto once I have the money.
As for that packer, I'd definitely get it. Gah, to be young and have no money.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|